Can divorced parents of two kids both file head of household?
/YES AS LONG AS THEY EACH HAVE A KID AND PASS THE BASE REQUIREMENTS FOR SUPPORTING THEM/% TIME, ETC.
Gordon Family Law believes that an informed client can make better choices, both financially and emotionally. You can see a complete list of every answered question at our Article Hub. If you have a question not answered, please email amanda@gordonfamilylaw.com. This Blog is not intended to be used as legal advice, please note that case law and statutes change over time and information on this website may not be current. While we hope you find this information helpful, it may not necessarily apply to your situation and we recommend that you speak to a family lawyer about your specific case.
YES AS LONG AS THEY EACH HAVE A KID AND PASS THE BASE REQUIREMENTS FOR SUPPORTING THEM/% TIME, ETC.
STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DENIAL OF JOINT CUSTODY ORDERS
Family Code Section 3082
When a request for joint custody is granted or denied, the court, upon the request of any party, shall state in its decision the reasons for granting or denying the request. A statement that joint physical custody is, or is not, in the best interest of the child is not sufficient to satisfy the requirements of this section.
Yes. If you earn overtime, commissions, or bonuses at your job, those funds will be considered income for the purpose of calculating child support.
Family Code section 4058 provides that "annual gross income ... means income from whatever source derived" and subsection (1) identifies bonuses and the Court is allowed to make a Smith/Ostler Order for support based on Overtime, bonuses or commissions received, income or earnings over set amount, and other specific income sources.
Sometimes the Ostler/Smith amount is less than what you would have been ordered to pay if the court used your last years tax return to calculate your support payments, so it’s not always something you should fear.
Typically, the court will use a percentage-based model. For example: Payor shall pay 10% of any gross income earned over $10,000 per month as additional child support.
Or, if you use the Dissomaster software, the Court could order the following:
Payor shall pay additional child and/or spousal support based on the attached Table for income earned over $125,000 per year.
The case law that permits these calculations is based on Marriage of Ostler & Smith (1990) 223 Cal.App.3d 33, Marriage of Mosley (2008) 165 Cal.App.4th 1375, and Marriage of Tong & Samson (2011) 197 Cal.App.4th 23.
See below for a typical Ostler Smith Bonus Table. If you have more questions about Ostler Smith Orders, you can contact me at Amanda@gordonfamilylaw.com for more information.
If you are likely many litigants and have recently had a disappointing court hearing with a family law court, you may be wondering if you can appeal that decision. Experienced family law attorneys in the Bay Area will tell you that the first step is for you to request the Reporters Transcript from the hearing.
Whether your hearing was a law and motion hearing for 20 minutes or a longer hearing where evidence was taken, you will first need a copy of your hearing’s transcript to determine your options.
If you have a temporary order for Attorneys fees, child support, or spousal support you normally have 60 days from Notice of Entry of Judgment to appeal the order.
You can extend the time allowed to appeal the order by filing one of the following motions:
(1) Motion to Reconsider
(2) Motion to Vacate
(3) Motion for New Trial
(4) Motion for Judgment CCP 631.8
If you have questions about whether you can or should appeal your family law decision, please reach out at amanda@gordonfamilylaw.com
Experienced family law attorneys in the San Francisco Bay Area can help you calculate your child support payments and reduce them if you have made an overpayment.
In California, the family court court has discretion to consider overpayments as a credit toward later-arising arrearages. In making its determination of whether to apply a credit, the trial court must consider any agreement between the parties as to the payment's purpose or any communication between the parents on the subject, absent fraud. In re Marriage of Peet (1978) 84 Cal.App.3d 974, 149 Cal.Rptr. 108 (CA-4, Div 2). See also Starr v. Starr (2010) 189 Cal.App.4th 277, 116 Cal.Rptr.3d 813 (CA-2, Div 8), In re Marriage of Smith and Maescher (1993) 21 Cal.App.4th 100, 26 Cal.Rptr.2d 133 (CA-4, Div 1).
If you are considering modifying child support and have more questions, you can contact me at Amanda@gordonfamilylaw.com for more information.
Gordon Family law provides family law services to the San Francisco Bay Area. , Gordon Family Law is committed to compassionate representation.
T: (415) 326–4148
1604 Solano Ave Albany, CA 94707
THIS WEBSITE PRESENTS TOPICS ON CALIFORNIA LAW AND IS WRITTEN BY AN ATTORNEY LICENSED TO PRACTICE LAW IN CALIFORNIA. INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WEBSITE IS TO BE USED FOR GENERAL INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES AND IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE.
GORDON FAMILY LAW REPRESENTS CLIENTS FROM SAN FRANCISCO AND THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, INCLUDING REDWOOD CITY, BURLINGAME, OAKLAND, WALNUT CREEK, SAN RAFAEL, FREMONT, SAN JOSE, SANTA ROSA, PALO ALTO, SUNNYVALE, BERKELEY, SONOMA COUNTY, MARIN COUNTY, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, ALAMEDA COUNTY, SAN MATEO COUNTY, SANTA CLARA COUNTY, SILICON VALLEY, NORTH BAY, SOUTH BAY, AND EAST BAY IN FAMILY LAW MATTERS.